Monday, May 13, 2013

The Youth Ministry of Thomas Boston

This afternoon, as I was reading through the Memoirs of Thomas Boston (1676-1732), I encountered a firsthand description of his catechetical "youth ministry" within the parish of Ettrick, where he served as pastor for two and a half decades. Check it out:
It had been my manner of a long time, besides the catechising the parish already mentioned, to have diets [i.e. meetings] of catechising those of the younger sort; and they met in the kirk, sometimes in my house. What time I began this course, I do not remember: but I think it has been early; for I learned it from Mr. Charles Gordon, minister of Ashkirk, whom I found so employed in his house when I went at a time to visit him; and he died, at furthest, in the year 1710. 
By this course I got several young people of both sexes, trained up to a good measure of knowledge; some of whom unto this day are solid and knowing Christians; but it suffered some interruptions. The time I found fittest for it, on their part, was from January to the beginning of May; and the whole youth of the parish, who were disposed, and had access to wait on, came together, and were welcome; as were others also, who inclined to hear. The intimation of their first diet was made from the pulpit; and then from time to time I set, and signified to them, their next diet: ordinarily they met once a-fortnight; sometimes once in twenty days only; sometimes once a-week, as occasion required. 
Several times these meetings were closed with a warm exhortation to practical religion; the which I sometime used also in the diets of catechising the parish. Thus this accessory work fell in the time when ordinarily I was weakest; and of late years, that my frailty notably increased, I wanted not inclination sometimes to give it over. But that I might better comport with it, I did some years ago cause make a portable iron grate, in which I had a fire in the kirk to sit at, on these occasions. [pp. 437-438]

Friday, May 10, 2013

Pastor's Wife Renews Covenant (on her deathbed)

Today, as I continued my trek through Thomas Boston's Memoirs, I ran across an account of his wife Catherine (Brown) engaging in personal covenant renewal with the Lord. This is a woman who had seen a majority of her children buried at an early age, had spent her last seven years virtually bedridden with mental and physical health problems, and now (once again) faced the imminent prospect of death. Below is Catherine's own firsthand account of this blessed spiritual transaction (after which the Lord graciously prolonged her life for a time). With the Lord's Supper scheduled for this Sabbath in our local congregation, what a timely reminder of what it means to renew afresh our faith in Christ and repentance from sin!
I have often aimed at embracing the everlasting covenant held forth in the gospel, and saw my welcome thereto; was willing also to betake myself to it, with my whole heart, and often essayed it. My defect still lay in the want of that confidence of faith, that the covenant should be made forthcoming to me, according to my needs, for time and eternity; fear still prevailing, and keeping me as it were standing on loose ground. 
But on 21st March betwixt two and four o'clock in the morning, on my bed of affliction, it pleased the Lord to stir me up, and help me to essay it again, and to get that gap in some measure filled up. Being deeply convinced of the sin of my nature, life, and practice, and judging it to be the source of my unfixedness, I did, in the first place, make confession of the sin of my nature, life, and practice, being as particular therein as I could reach; especially confessing my predominant sin, and laying my heart open to the omniscient God, to search and try it, in the most retired corners thereof; that if there was any lust or idol that I knew not of, I might be made sensible of the same: and I judged and condemned myself, as deserving nothing but the utmost of God's indignation. 
Then I looked to the way of salvation held forth in the word of the gospel; beheld Jesus Christ, a Saviour every way suited to my needs, my lost and undone condition. I saw an absolute need of Him, in all His offices; and a glorious fitness in them, and each of them, for my case. So I did, with the whole bent of my soul, embrace the everlasting covenant held forth to me in the word of the gospel of grace; cast myself over on the Lord Jesus Christ, and receive Him in all His offices; take God for my God in Him; and, with my whole heart, gave up myself, soul and body, to be the Lord's for ever: my soul going out after Christ in His kingly office, as much as in the rest, for the sanctification of my nature, and subduing of my strong corruptions, without reserve; especially my predominant, which I saw head and shoulders above the rest; being sincerely desirous, in the sight of God, never to entertain peaceably, but, through His covenant-grace, to war against every lust whatsoever, though a right hand, or right eye. 
And I was in a good measure brought to a confident persuasion, that this foundation of the everlasting covenant, on which I had bottomed my soul for time and eternity, had all things in it needful for me; and that it should be made forthcoming to me, for my several needs for time and eternity, according to His faithful word of promise: pleading, that my failings should not make void this transactions, and that I be allowed to remember it, and renew it, as often as need requires. 
And having for my exercise a more than ordinary load on my spirit [i.e. her failing health], I did, with all the solemn seriousness I was capable of, beg and request for the Lord's pity and help in that particular; that if He saw it meet He might remove it, but if it must continue, that He would keep me near Himself in it; that His grace may be sufficient for me, and I may be kept from sinking despondency, still believing, in the worst of times, that God is my God in Jesus Christ the Mediator, and will with the temptation give an outgate, or strength to bear it. 
And with the same solemn seriousness, I begged, that His Spirit, whom I was helped to look to for assistance in this my address, might all along direct, guide, and assist me in my addresses to Him for the supply of my wants, and to aim at and seek my fruit, by sticking to the root Jesus Christ, and not from my sincerity, nor anything else in myself; looking on the Lord Jesus as the head of influences, and as made of God unto me, wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption; from whence I was led in unto a sweet view of my union and communion with Him. [pp. 402-403]

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Tracing John Calvin

My sons (left to right) Micaiah and Frederick tracing Calvin's likeness (along with a potent quotable) 

Frederick working on Calvin's all-important eyebrows

Micaiah's finished product

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Fairbairn on Circumcision & Baptism

Concerning the relationship between circumcision and baptism, Patrick Fairbairn writes,
There never was a more evident misreading of the palpable facts of history than appears in the disposition so often manifested to limit the rite of circumcision to one line merely of Abraham's posterity, and to regard it as the mere outward badge of an external national distinction. . .
The bearing of [the rite of circumcision] on the ordinance of Christian baptism can not be overlooked, but it may still be mistaken. The relation between circumcision and baptism is not properly that of type and antitype; the one is a symbolical ordinance as well as the other, and both alike have an outward form and an inward reality. It is precisely in such ordinances that the Old and the New Dispensations approach nearest to each other, and, we might almost say, stand formally upon the same level. The difference does not so much lie in the ordinances themselves, as in the comparative amount of grace and truth respectively exhibited in them -- necessarily less in the earlier, and more in the later. . .  
[I]f we look, not to the form, but to the substance, which ought here, as in other things, to be chiefly regarded, we perceive an essential agreement -- such as is indeed marked by the apostle, when speaking of those who have been buried with Christ in baptism, he represents them as having obtained "the circumcision of Christ" [Col. 2:11]. So far from being less indicative of a change of nature in the proper subjects of it, circumcision was even more so; in a more obvious and palpable manner it bespoke the necessity of a deliverance from the native corruption of the soul in those who should become true possessors of blessing. Hence the apostle makes use of the earlier rite to explain the symbolical import of the later, and describes the spiritual change indicated and required by it as "a putting off of the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ," and "having the uncircumcision of the flesh quickened together with Christ." 
It would have been travelling entirely in the wrong direction, to use such language for purposes of explanation in Christian times, if the ordinance of circumcision had not shadowed forth this spiritual quickening and purification even more palpably and impressively than baptism itself; and shadowed it forth, not prospectively alone for future times, but immediately and personally for the members of the Old Covenant. For, by the terms of the covenant, these were ordained to be, not types of blessing only, but also partakers of blessing. The good contemplated in the covenant was to have its present commencement in their experience, as well as in the future a deeper foundation and a more enlarged development. And the outward putting away of the filth of the flesh in circumcision could never have symbolized a corresponding inward purification for the members of the New Covenant, if it had not first done this for the members of the Old. The shadow must have a substance in the one as well as the other.
Such being the case as to the essential agreement between the two ordinances, an important element for deciding in regard to the propriety of infant baptism may still be derived from the practice established in the rite of circumcision. The grand principle of connecting parent and child together for the attainment of spiritual objects, and marking the connection by an impressive signature, was there most distinctly and broadly sanctioned. And if the parental bond and its attendant obligations be not weakened, but rather elevated and strengthened, by the higher revelations of the Gospel, it would be strange indeed if the liberty at least, nay, the propriety and right, if not the actual obligation, to have their children brought by an initiatory ordinance under the bond of the covenant, did not belong to parents under the Gospel. The one ordinance no more than the other insures the actual transmission of the grace necessary to effect the requisite change; but it exhibits that grace -- on the part of God pledges it -- and takes the subject of the ordinance bound to use it for the accomplishment of the proper end. Baptism does this now, as circumcision did of old; and if it was done in the one case through the medium of the parent to the child, one does not see why it may not be done now, unless positively prohibited, in the other. [Typology of Scripture, Vol. 1, pp. 310, 313-315]

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Fairbairn on Realistic Optimism & Davidic Typology


Contemporary expressions of Postmillennial optimism have all too often been marked by unsettling levels of unrealistic triumphalism. Hence, it is not surprising that the godly instincts of many Reformed Christians have urged them to embrace the seemingly more moderate "Optimistic Amillennial" position.

At the same time, we must not forget that historic Postmillennialism is neither triumphalistic concerning the future nor unrealistic concerning this present world. Its most careful exponents recognize that the victory of Christ's kingdom in history will never eradicate the mixed nature of the visible church, the believer's predominant longing for heaven and the Second Advent, or the ordinary connection between godliness and cross-bearing. Such exponents also recognize that the large-scale victory of the gospel (over false religion, secularism, and national 'Christlessness') may not necessarily occur in the immediate future and will not occur via any other method than gospel preaching and discipleship.

Once placed within this more balanced theological framework and evaluated solely upon its exegetical merits, I believe that historic Postmillennialism becomes far more attractive to "Optimistic Amillennialists" who were perhaps scared off (and rightly so!) by the excesses of contemporary Postmill writers.

In any event, below is a passing treatment of this subject by Scottish exegetical wizard, Patrick Fairbairn, in his masterful work, The Typology of Scripture. In this excerpt, there is much to glean regarding the flavor and feel of historic Postmillennialism, as well as the eschatological significance of Davidic Typology. Enjoy!
There are revelations in the Gospel, however, which point to events still future in the Messiah’s kingdom…. We do not refer to the last issues of the Gospel dispensation, when the concerns of time shall have become finally merged in the unalterable results of eternity; but to events, of which this earth itself is still to be the theatre, in the closing periods of Messiah’s reign. This prospective ground is in many points overlaid with controversy, and much concerning it must be regarded as matter of doubtful disputation. Yet there are certain great landmarks which intelligent and sober-minded Christians can scarcely fail to consider as fixed. It is not, for example, a more certain mark of the Messiah who was to come, that He should be a despised and rejected man, should pass through the deepest humiliation, and, after a mighty struggle with evil, attain to the seat of empire, than it is of the Messiah who has thus personally fought and conquered, that He shall totally subdue all adversaries of His Church and kingdom, make His Church co-extensive with the boundaries of the habitable globe, and exalt her members to the highest position of honor and blessing.  
For my own part, I should as soon doubt that the first series of events were the just object of expectation before, as the other have become since, the personal appearing of Christ; and for breadth and prominence of place in the prophetical portions, especially of New Testament Scripture, this has all that could be desired in its behalf. But how far still is the object from being realized? How unlikely, even, that it should ever be so, if we had nothing more to found upon than calculations of reason, and the common agencies of providence. 
That the progress of society in knowledge and virtue should gradually lead, at however a distant period, to the extirpation of idolatry, the abolition of the grosser forms of superstition, and a general refinement and civilization of manners, requires no great stretch of faith to believe. Such a result evidently lies within the bounds of natural probability, if only sufficient time were given to accomplish it. But, achieved ere the glorious King of Zion should have His promised ascendancy in the affairs of men, and the spiritual ends for which he especially reigns should be adequately secured! This happy consummation might still be found at an unapproachable distance, even when the other had passed into reality; nor are there wanting signs in the present condition of the world to awaken our fears lest such may actually be the case. For in those countries where the light of divine truth and the arts of civilization have become more widely diffused, we see many things prevailing that are utterly at variance with the purity and peace of the Gospel – numberless heresies in doctrine, disorders that seem to admit of no healing, and practical corruptions which set at defiance all authority and rule. 
In the very presence of the light of heaven, and amid the full play of Christian influences, the god of this world still holds possession of by far the larger portion of mankind; and innumerable obstacles present themselves on every side against the universal diffusion and the complete ascendancy of the pure principles of the Gospel of Christ. When such things are taken into account, how hopeless seems the prospect of a triumphant Church and a regenerated world! Of a Saviour holding the undivided empire of all lands! Of a kingdom in which there is no longer anything to offend, and all appears replenished with life and blessing! The partial triumphs which Christianity is still gaining in single individuals and particular districts, can go but a little way to assure us of so magnificent a result. And it may well seem as if other influences than such as are now in operation would require to be put forth before the expected good can reach its accomplishment.
Something, no doubt, may be done to reassure the mind, by looking back on the past history of Christianity, and contrasting its present condition with the point from which it started. The small mustard-seed has certain sprung into a lofty tree, stretching its luxuriant branches over many of the best regions of the earth. See Christianity as it appeared in its divine Author, when He wandered about as a lowly and despised teacher, attended only by a little band of followers as lowly and despised as Himself; or again, when He was hanging on a malefactor’s cross, His very friends ashamed or terrified to avow their connection with Him; or even at another and more advanced stage of its earthly history, when its still small, and now resolute, company of adherents, unfurled the banner of salvation, with the fearful odds everywhere against them of hostile kings and rulers, an ignorant and debased populace, a powerful and interested priesthood, and a mighty host of superstitions, which had struck their roots through the entire framework of society, and had become venerable, as well as strong, by their antiquity. 
See Christianity as it appeared then, and see it now standing erect upon the ruins of the hierarchies and superstitions which once threatened to extinguish it – planted with honor in the regions where, for a time, it was scarcely suffered to exist – the recognized religion of the most enlightened nations of the earth, the delight and solace of the good, the study of the wise and learned, at once the source and the bulwark of all that is most pure, generous, free, and happy in modern civilization. 
Comparing thus the present with the past – looking down from the altitude that has been reached upon the low and unpromising condition out of which Christianity at the first arose, we are not without considerable materials in the history of the Gospel itself, for confirming our faith in the prospects which still wait for their fulfillment. On this ground alone it may scarcely seem more unlikely that Christianity should proceed from the elevation it has already won to the greatly more commanding altitude it is yet destined to attain, than to have arisen from such small beginnings, and in the face of obstacles so many and so powerful, to its present influential and honorable position.

But why not revert to a still earlier period in the Church’s history? Why withhold from our wavering hearts the benefit which they might derive from the form and pattern of divine things, formerly exhibited in the parallel affairs of a typical and earthly kingdom? It was the divine appointment concerning Christ, that He should sit upon the throne of David, to order and to establish it. In the higher sphere of God’s administration, and for the world at large, He was to do what had been done through David in the lower and on the limited territory of an earthly kingdom. The history of the one, therefore, may justly be regarded as the shadow of the other. 
But it is still only the earlier part of the history of David’s kingdom which has found its counterpart in the events of Gospel times [i.e., thus far in history]. The Shepherd of Israel has been anointed King over the heritage of the Lord, and the impious efforts of His adversaries to disannul the appointment have entirely miscarried. The formidable train of evils which obstructed His way to the throne of government, and which were directed with the profoundest cunning and malice by him who, on account of sin, had been permitted to become the prince of this world, have been all met and overcome – with no other effect than to render manifest the Son’s indefeasible right to hold the scepter of universal empire over the affairs of men. Now, therefore, He reigns in the midst of His enemies; but He must also reign till these enemies themselves are put down – till the inheritance has been redeemed from all evil, and universal peace, order, and blessing have been established.

Is not this also what the subsequent history of the earthly kingdom fully warrants us to expect? It was long after David’s appointment to the throne, before his divine right to reign was generally acknowledged; and still longer before the overthrow of the last combination of adversaries, and the termination of the last train of evils, admitted of the kingdom entering on its ultimate stage of settled peace and glory. The affairs of David himself never wore a more discouraging and desperate aspect than immediately before his great adversary received the mortal blow which laid him in the dust. After this, years had to elapse before the adverse parties in Israel were even externally subdued, and brought to render a formal acknowledgement to the Lord’s anointed. When this point, again, had been reached, what internal evils festered in the kingdom, and what smouldering fires of enmity still burned! Notwithstanding the vigorous efforts made to subdue these, we see them at last bursting forth in the dreadful and unnatural outbreak of Absalom’s rebellion, which threatened for a time to involve all in hopeless ruin and confusion. And with these internal evils and insurrections, how many hostile encounters had to be met from without! some of which were so terrible, that the very earth was felt, in a manner, to shake under the stroke (Ps. 60). Yet all at length yielded; and partly by the prowess of faith, partly by the remarkable turns given to events in providence, the kingdom did reach a position of exampled prosperity, peace, and blessing. 
But in all this we have the development of a typical dispensation bringing the assurance that the same position shall in due time be reached in the higher sphere and nobler concerns of Messiah’s kingdom. The same determinate counsel and foreknowledge, the same living energy, the same overruling Providence, is equally competent now, as it is alike pledged, to secure a corresponding result. And if the people of God have but discernment to read aright the history of the past, they will find that they have no need to despair of a successful issue, but ever reason to hope that judgment shall at length be brought forth into victory. [Typology of Scripture, Vol. 1, pp. 184-188]

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Divine Comfort, Reformation, and the Psalms


In Volume 3 (Appendix VII) of his Commentary on the Psalms, Lutheran commentator Ernst Hengstenberg writes,
The Book of Psalms is full of the noblest testimonies to the being of God, and his perfections. It has contributed, in this respect, vast materials for developing the consciousness of mankind, and the Christian church rests far more upon them for its apprehensions of God than might at first sight be supposed. To perceive to what an extent this is the case, we have only to search out the traces of the Psalms in our liturgies and church-songs. Even the French Deists, the theo-philanthropists, sworn enemies of the Bible, could only make out their liturgy by the help of the Psalms. This is one chief reason why the Psalter is so precious to the afflicted. It presents God so clearly and vividly before their eyes, that they see him, in a manner, with their bodily sight, and find thereby the sting taken from their pains. In this, too, lies one great element of the importance of the Psalter for the present times. What men now most of all need is, that the blanched image of God should again be freshened up in them. This, not the denial of particular tenets of revelation, which is only a consequence of the other, and which can never be thoroughly eradicated so long as the fundamental evil remains, is the deepest grief of the church, and one which believers will still have to bear with. Those who would strive to effect, in this respect, a reformation in themselves or others, will find in the Psalms a mighty help. The more closely we connect ourselves with them, the more will God cease to be to us a shadowy form, which can neither hear, nor help, nor judge us, and to which we can present no supplication.

Monday, April 8, 2013

275 Years Later: Edwards on the Origins of American Apostasy

Right now I'm reading through a collection of sermons by Jonathan Edwards, entitled, Altogether Lovely: Jonathan Edwards on the Glory and Excellency of Jesus Christ. The fifth sermon in this volume expounds the theme of "Jesus Christ, the Same Yesterday, Today, and Forever" from Hebrews 13:8. In applying this text, Edwards notes Christ's immutable faithfulness in contrast to those who prove unfaithful to their Christian profession. From his perspective (preaching in April of 1738), colonial America had already "for a long time" suffered from a rising tide of covenant-breaking apostasy within its borders.

Edward's comments (see below) should be a wake-up call for everyone who believes that America's ethical, cultural, and religious collapse began recently. In reality, what we are witnessing today began long ago with a widespread disloyalty and ambivalence toward Christ's crown and covenant. At the same time, what strikes me even more is how Edwards' description of covenant-breaking applies equally to many in the church today. Until we (by God's grace) become more outraged by our own covenant-breaking tendencies than we are about President Obama or homosexual marriage, it is unlikely that America's ethical nosedive will be reversed anytime soon.
This doctrine reproves all who have entered into the bonds of the Christian covenant, and have proven false to it. If Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever, and is always the same towards us in fulfilling as He is in promising, then surely we ought to be so towards Him. If He never breaks covenant with His people, then they are greatly to be reproved who are false and treacherous in their dealings with Him. Therefore this reproves a covenant people who depart from Christ and break covenant with Him, as we in this land have done, having greatly revolted and degenerated both from the pure profession and religious practice of the first times of the country. Though Christ and His doctrine, and the religion that He taught, are always the same, yet this country has great multitudes in it who are driven to and fro by every wind of doctrine, and have now, for a long time, been exceedingly corrupted by the prevalence of many evil customs and practices.
And by this doctrine is every particular person reproved who does not take care to keep covenant with Christ. We are in general under the solemn bonds of our baptismal covenant; and that covenant that was sealed in our baptism most of us have explicitly owned and expressly and solemnly promised to walk in, in a way of obedience to all the commands of God, as long as we live. We have, time after time, in the most solemn manner, sealed this covenant anew by taking the body and blood of Christ upon it at the Lord's Supper. They bring dreadful guilt on themselves who are not careful to fulfill such vows. Those who have solemnly vowed to obey Christ in all His commandments as long as they live, and have sealed these vows by eating and drinking at the Lord's Supper with far greater solemnity than if they sealed it with as many solemn oaths, yet who live in ways of sin, in the neglect of several commanded duties, and in the commission of forbidden sin, or at least do not make it the care of their lives strictly to keep Christ's commands -- surely such persons render themselves very guilty. [pp. 131-132]